[nightmare_boy]

I should hope that you know you're in love before you get married. ;x

[therapywouldhelp]

hooobo wrote: I think you should wait until you get married, but thats my opinion. Friends should not have sex because well their friends for so long, and after that who knows what will happen, don't mess with friendship. When your married, at least you know that your in love.

Oh I think my ex and my friendship is pretty damn strong.

[marley_asaur]

I don't see it as a bad thing. It's just as long as you aren't just sleeping around with anybody. Best friends do it with eachother, isn't that what they call Friend with Benefits?
As long as you aren't cheating and are using protection is O.K. I wouldn't do it. I am certainly going to wait for the right person.

[foreignskyline]

Honestly, I'm very odd when it comes to sex, and relationships. I have an on-again-off-again sexual relationship with my best friend (who's a female), but I also have had sex with a male friend of mine. I've never had sex with anyone else, though.


One-night stands aren't for me. If they're for you, then cheers. But I just tend to have sexual relations with someone I've known for years. It's just...I don't know. I feel more comfortable, safe. But as for the thread itself, I don't condemn those who have sex with out commitment (considering I do that), simply because not everyone wants to wait to "fall in love" and find the "perfect" person to have sex with. It's all a personal preference, I think.

[lo_specchio]

la_senorita_azul wrote: And do I really need a reason why I find something disgusting? I can't control whether or not I like stuff. If I don't like broccoli, I can't force myself to like it. I just don't like it. Same goes with concepts such as uncommitted sex. It doesn't sit well with me. If you want to eat broccoli, go ahead. I won't stop you. If you want to have meaningless sex with every guy in town, I won't stop you.

If you mean you find it disgusting when applied to yourself, then, of course, I doubt anyone will say you need a reason for that. I just thought that, unlike broccoli, you were disapproving of people who have uncommitted sex. I guess I was wrong.

[la_senorita_azul]

lo_specchio wrote: If you mean you find it disgusting when applied to yourself, then, of course, I doubt anyone will say you need a reason for that. I just thought that, unlike broccoli, you were disapproving of people who have uncommitted sex. I guess I was wrong.

I may not like the idea of it, but it's not for me to like or dislike. Like I said, if somebody wants to have uncommitted sex, I don't judge. It may make me uncomfortable, but I'm sure I do things that make others uncomfortable.

[yokaiprincess]

Sometimes you have really bad sexual tension and need to get it out. Uncommitted sex isnt bad (however im considered a virgin so it might not matter.)

[la_senorita_azul]

yokaiprincess wrote: sometimes you have really bad sexual tension and need to get it out. Uncommitted sex isnt bad (however im considered a virgin so it might not matter.)

I may be wrong, but didn't you say once that you got raped by your dad or stepdad or something and got pregnant?
Sure, it may not have been your choice, but I'd call that a loss of virginity... I don't believe in virgin birth.

[supershrimp]

la_senorita_azul wrote: I may be wrong, but didn't you say once that you got raped by your dad or stepdad or something and got pregnant? Sure, it may not have been your choice, but I'd call that a loss of virginity... I don't believe in virgin birth.

She said she was considered a virgin. Meaning although she's not actually one, she considers herself to be. And although I agree with you, she may not. She may consider virgin as having consent in the fact that you had sex. Idk.

[supershrimp]

yokaiprincess wrote: sometimes you have really bad sexual tension and need to get it out..)

Masturbation.