[alaskaheidi]

la_senorita_azul wrote: I mean that she says that she supports separation of Church and State, yet she wants America to "uphold the fact that it was founded for Christians, by Christians". Also, she supposedly supports freedom of expression, yet wants to ban homosexuality from being discussed in elementary school.

I see no lies there. Just different beliefs and values than yours.

When did banning homosexuality from being discussed in elementary school come up? When did she say that, specifically?

[alaskaheidi]

b0udicca wrote: Srry, I don't trust articles about Palin coming from an uber-pro-life website. Try a legitimate news source next time.

Sorry, I just looked at the meat of the article and didn't look well enough at the site. I don't think that really changes it though.

It's really hard to find truly unbiased news sources out there! Everyone seems super biased either one way or the other. How CAN any site be unbiased when it's authored by humans, whose opinions always come through?

[fuzzykumquat]

b0udicca wrote: Srry, I don't trust articles about Palin coming from an uber-pro-life website. Try a legitimate news source next time.

Well that's fair considering I wouldn't trust anything coming from planned parenthood myself.

[alaskaheidi]

labwounds wrote: lol srsly. this is the woman who's pastor is a witch hunter or whatever the ****, the woman who is against abortion even in cases of rape or incest, the woman who thinks its 'Gods plan' that we are in a war, the woman who can see Russia from her house, the woman who wants to kill endangered species.....you really don't think she'd make your ass pay for a rape kid? Do you really think she wouldn't do such a thing? Cause I think she would.

1) That was a visiting pastor from Kenya, not hers

2) millions of people do not believe in abortion

3) millions of people believe that God has a plan in
everything

4) Alaskans voted to continue the wolf control program here. If we don't, the moose and caribou populations will vanish (they are dwindling fast) and then the wolves will die anyway because their source of meat will be gone. Not to mention the people who rely on moose and caribou meat to live. Wolves are more than plentiful up here. Some species are endangered in areas of the lower 48 but not here. She didn't just make this up on her own, this is a game management tactic in our state.

And I REALLY don't think she would want the victim of a rape to pay for the kit. Really.

[la_senorita_azul]

alaskaheidi wrote: I see no lies there. Just different beliefs and values than yours. When did banning homosexuality from being discussed in elementary school come up? When did she say that, specifically?

I consider the fact that her actions and words contradict themselves quite often a lie.
And here's an article on one case where she wanted a book about homosexuality removed from where children can read it:
LGBT Book & Video Blog: Sarah Palin censored 'Daddy's Roommate' without ever reading the book
I have read other articles in which Palin opposed homosexuality being taught about to young children on AOL. I can't find them in the AOL archive, though.

[alaskaheidi]

entropian_v2 wrote: well, remember, according to her, polar bears aren't endangered.

Yeah, that I don't agree with. Oil.

[alaskaheidi]

la_senorita_azul wrote: I consider the fact that her actions and words contradict themselves quite often a lie. And here's an article on one case where she wanted a book about homosexuality removed from where children can read it: LGBT Book & Video Blog: Sarah Palin censored 'Daddy's Roommate' without ever reading the book I have read other articles in which Palin opposed homosexuality being taught about to young children on AOL. I can't find them in the AOL archive, though.

That's hearsay, from a gay website.

So here's an article refuting the whole book banning topic, including a list of books:

Michelle Malkin » The bogus Sarah Palin Banned Books List

[la_senorita_azul]

Same info from a Christian site:
Sarah Palin, 'Daddy's Roommate' and the Left's Hypocrisy on 'Book Banning' - Christian Newswire

Both sides of the story.
I think that her hitlist may be the same as the list of previously banned books, but still think that she does in fact want them banned.

[redheadsmartiehi]

la_senorita_azul wrote: Um, a rape kit is what you use to figure out who the criminal is. If you don't know who the criminal is, how can they pay for it? And if you know who it is, why would you need a kit in the first place?

i meant after they were convicted
srry for not being more clear